loader-logo

OUR EXPERIENCE

Tap into our Unmatched Extensive Diverse Experience

30 Million

Documents Reviewed

Our team has taken part in multiple reviews through our 20 year tenure in eDiscovery environment. We have teams of reviewers ready at a moments notice to assist with various forms of reviews.

80 TB

of ESI

Our team has processed various forms of ESI. We are able to assisted clients with collecting and preserving data. Our tools can help reduce the large data sets and create a more manageable set for final review.

3 million

Documents Produced

Our team has produced documents in countless engagements. Providing the right tools to narrow the data set to produce the relevant data in as engagement.

OUR CLIENTS

CASE STUDIES

CASE STUDY 1

EXPONENTIAL GROWTH WITH
NO IDLE RESOURCES

• 1 Lawyer, 3 Engineers, 2 Construction Professionals

• 40+ Years of experience

• 150,000+ Documents

• ~44 Seconds per Document Reviewed


case study 2

FOCUS ON WHAT MATTERS

• Scan, categorize, and summarize 2,000+ project daily reports

• 4 Weeks

• Created issue timelines for 12 largest concerns




CASE STUDY 3

QUICK RAMP UP AND FAST RESULTS

• 300,000 Documents

• Block tagged 1/3 of information as unnecessary

• 3 Weeks

• 700 Hot Docs



Retrieve is a nimble, all-inclusive eDiscovery and Litigation Support provider.

START YOUR DISCOVERY PROCESS

A MESSAGE FROM OUR FOUNDER

We started Retrieve to resolve cost, quality, and capacity challenges we experienced with traditional eDiscovery vendors. We are a nimble, all-inclusive eDiscovery and Litigation Support provider.

Cost Comparisons

One of the key reasons we started Retrieve was to reduce costs for clients. Retrieve costs are, on average, 39% of total costs when compared to many other traditional vendors.

Our International Reach

Retrieve supports clients internationally, as well as throughout the United States. Retrieve has overseen productions in on international matters and can tailor services to comport with international laws and requirements that, in some instances, differ significantly from typical considerations in North American litigation and discovery processes.